Agent-based models, computational simulations, and experimental social systems are now central to many fields of research — from political science to behavioral economics. But while researchers pour their energy into designing accurate models and generating replicable outputs, one crucial aspect is often overlooked: how to cite and document this work.
In the world of simulation-based research, proper citation is more than just a technical requirement. It’s about building transparency, enabling reproducibility, and acknowledging the hybrid nature of sources — often combining code, data, theory, and narrative. So which style should you use: APA, MLA, or Chicago?
At first glance, citation formatting might seem like an administrative detail. But for simulation-based research, it’s a structural pillar. Simulations often rely on multiple layers of information:
Referencing these elements consistently ensures that your readers can trace your logic, replicate your approach, and build upon your model. And that's where choosing the right citation style comes in.
For a breakdown of each format’s features, strengths, and common use cases, see Citation Style Guide 2025.
APA (American Psychological Association) is widely used across psychology, sociology, and education — making it an obvious candidate for simulation studies in social sciences.
Strengths:
Simulation Example:
If you're citing a model described in a publication:
(Jansen, 2022)
And in the reference list:
Jansen, M. (2022). Agent-based modeling of trust in online communities. Simulation and Society Press.
For code repositories or datasets:
Becker, T. (2021). ABM_COVID19_simulator (Version 2.3) [Computer software]. GitHub. https://github.com/tbecker-abm/covid19sim APA’s growing compatibility with digital artifacts makes it ideal for modelers publishing in interdisciplinary journals.
MLA (Modern Language Association) is dominant in humanities — literature, languages, and media studies. It's rarely used in simulation modeling, but it may surface in cross-disciplinary work involving cultural or philosophical analysis of models.
Strengths:
Simulation Example:
Citing an article:
(Becker 45)
Works Cited:
Becker, Thomas. Agent-Based Rhetoric: Simulating Cultural Dialogue. Journal of Digital Humanities, vol. 6, no. 2, 2022, pp. 41–59.
MLA can be effective if your work analyzes models as narratives or media artifacts rather than technical tools.
Chicago offers the richest options — with two systems:
Strengths:
In-text:
¹ Thomas Becker, Modeling Public Opinion with ABMs (Simulation Press, 2022), 88.
Bibliography:
Becker, Thomas. Modeling Public Opinion with ABMs. Simulation Press, 2022.
For software:
Becker, Thomas. COVID-TrustSim. GitHub repository. Last modified June 2023. https://github.com/tbecker-abm/trustsim
If you're producing archival, long-form research with complex source material, Chicago NB offers unparalleled clarity.
Choosing a citation style is about more than preference. For agent-based and simulation studies, consider the following:
Element | Why It Matters | How to Cite |
---|---|---|
Agent-Based Model (ABM) | Captures structure, rules, and behavior of agents in simulated environments | Use software or dataset citation format; include name, version, and source (e.g., GitHub) |
Simulation Output Data | Represents results from model runs and forms the basis for analysis | Treat as a dataset; mention simulation conditions and date of generation |
Code Repository | Ensures transparency and reproducibility of simulation | Include repository name, platform (e.g., GitHub), commit/version, and URL |
Model Documentation | Explains model assumptions, structure, and rationale | Cite as a technical report, preprint, or white paper depending on availability |
Simulation Software | Provides the computational environment for running models | Follow citation rules for software tools (e.g., NetLogo, Repast) |
Parameter Settings | Critical for replicating simulation behavior and validating results | Include in-text mention or cite supplementary material describing the configuration |
While ESSA doesn’t mandate a specific style, most papers and conference presentations fall into social science categories — sociology, political science, environmental studies — where APA or Chicago Author–Date are common.
If your simulation:
And if you’re preparing a submission to a specific journal or conference proceedings, always check their author guidelines first.
Managing references for models, data, and software can be challenging. These tools can simplify the process:
Zotero: Excellent for tagging datasets and GitHub repos
Mendeley: Great for PDF-based literature and group collaboration
BibLaTeX: If you’re writing in LaTeX, customize citation styles to include software
Cite This For Me: Quick generator for APA, MLA, or Chicago formats
There’s no single perfect citation style for simulation-based research. The best choice depends on your audience, research questions, and publication venue.
Whether you follow APA, MLA, or Chicago, your goal should be consistency, transparency, and clarity — especially in a field where reproducibility is essential.
“Citations are not bureaucracy — they’re blueprints. They show others where your model comes from, and where it could go.”
And if you're still unsure, use the comprehensive Citation Style Guide 2025 to compare formats and pick the best one for your simulation work.
✍️ About the Author
This article was prepared by the ESSA content team in collaboration with academic contributors focused on simulation transparency and scholarly communication.
Let us know how you cite your models in our upcoming ESSA 2025 blog series.